Monday, December 15, 2014

selling off our poles and wires means NSW has Nothing to gain, plenty to lose

Earlier this year, the Premier announced he’s seeking a mandate at the March 2015 state election for his plan to privatise NSW electricity. But this week, anew report was released that drives a stake through the heart of Mike Baird’s plan to sell off our — the public’s — poles and wires.
The independent McKell Institute (which Mike Baird has said has a “proud history” and whose work “we need to do more of") looked into the government’s privatisation plan and the report title sums up their conclusions nicely: selling off our poles and wires means NSW has Nothing to gain, plenty to lose. In short, if Mike Baird wins the election, NSW loses.
Add your name to the petition now and tell Mike Baird to stop the sell-off:http://stoptheselloff.org.au/sign-the-petition
The McKell Institute analysis concluded there’s “no logical case for privatisation” backed up by a number of findings:
  • The state currently earns $1.7 billion each year from NSW electricity Transmission and Distribution, and selling our poles and wires is likely to hurt the state budget over the medium-to-long-term
  • NSW’s public electricity assets operate more efficiently than those privatised in other states
  • Selling off poles and wires doesn’t cut costs for business and would actually increase costs for us — consumers — by more than $100 per year
  • Rather than reinvesting revenue from electricity into improving the system, privatisation would mean revenues would line the pockets of investors, whereas state assets focus on the citizens they serve
With so much evidence exposing the Baird government’s disinformation, the report “recommends that the NSW Government abandon its plans to privatise.” That’s exactly what those who know the industry best and look after our electricity assets — the Electrical Trades Union — have been saying for months and why they’ve launched the “Stop the Sell Off” campaign.
Add your name to more than one thousand concerned citizens who’ve signed the petition, and together, we can make sure Mike Baird has no mandate to sell off our poles and wires and instead keep jobs safe, prices low, and ensure public assets continue serving the citizens of this great state, rather than lining the pockets of big business.
In Union,
Mark Lennon
Secretary
Unions NSW

Monday, November 24, 2014

UNIVERSITY STAFF CONDEMN VICE-CHANCELLORS’ CALL FOR FEE-DEREGULATION



UNIVERSITY STAFF CONDEMN VICE-CHANCELLORS’ CALL FOR FEE-DEREGULATION

University staff are urging cross-bench senators to maintain their opposition to fee

deregulation, in the wake of a renewed call from Vice-Chancellors for an amended

version of the bill to be passed in the next fortnight.

Vice-Chancellors’ enthusiasm for deregulated university fees ignores the

overwhelming opposition not only of the public, but of university staff, says the

National Alliance for Public Universities (NAPU).

NAPU was formed in October to give university staff committed to a public university

system another voice to oppose fee deregulation.

The NAPU charter outlining the principles of a public higher education sector has

been signed by over 1300 university staff members from around the country,

including Nobel Prize Winner J.M. Coetzee, University of Canberra Vice-Chancellor

Stephen Parker and over 100 senior professors.

“There are fewer than forty Vice Chancellors in Australia. They don’t represent the

tens of thousands of university staff, who, like the rest of the public, are strongly

against deregulation,” said NAPU spokesperson Dr Nick Riemer. “Vice Chancellors

should be lobbying government to fund universities better, not advising them on

what level of cuts is acceptable.”

“We are very encouraged by Jacqui Lambie’s statement that she will never support

deregulation,” Riemer continued, “and we call on all the other cross-benchers to

give similar undertakings. There is nothing fair about deregulation. A Fairfax-Ipsos

poll at the start of November found overwhelming public opposition to the

government’s plans. Vice-Chancellors are out of step both with the public, and with

basic principles of equity and social justice.”

More information:

Dr Nick Riemer 0481 339 937; Dr George Morgan 0414 958726.

http://napuaustralia.org.

Thursday, October 30, 2014

AN ‘UNPRECEDENTED ATTACK’ ON WORKERS’ RIGHTS

"Do these charges set a new precedent; will it be deemed unlawful in the future for unionists or community members to attend a political protest? This issue goes to the very heart of our democracy and the right to free speech."

For the full story click here.


Thursday, October 16, 2014

ANTI-PRIVATISATION PETITION RALLY, SYDNEY 13TH NOVEMBER 2014

Why Australian workplaces need much better leaders

By Peter Gahan, University of Melbourne

Over the last decade, Australia has experienced a productivity slump. Our long-term productivity growth ranks well below the OECD average, and significantly below that enjoyed by leading economies.
However, the reality of falling productivity and its consequences has been masked for most ordinary Australians by the mining boom, which has created created jobs and driven up wages.
A number of international studies have suggested that in many workplaces the quality of leadership and management skills can have significant direct effects on productivity, as well as indirect effects through their consequences for how workplaces adapt to changing business conditions and innovate.
A similar picture is now emerging in Australia. This gap is evident in official data on the ability of Australian business to introduce technological innovations, new products or services, or new management systems or organisational innovations. Among SMEs and in certain industries, the record is even more dismal.
Research on the take-up of high-performance management practices also indicates a paradox: while the types of practices that lead to better performance are well established, few workplaces adopt them.

Are Australians bad managers?

Why do Australian businesses have such a dismal record in improving the very things that drive workplace productivity? There are many reasons, but the quality of management and leadership in the workplace is a critical one.
It is clear, for example, that many Australian managers are seriously underqualified for the job they do. Australian Bureau of Statistics data on the qualifications of different occupation groups show that fewer managers have post-school qualifications than do the unskilled and semi-skilled workers they manage.
This is alarming at a time when the challenges of businesses are become more complex. This qualifications gap among our managers is particular acute among small and medium-sized businesses. Clearly, we need to invest more in training managers.
The Centre for Workplace Leadership at the University of Melbourne has begun to track employee perceptions of management and leadership in Australian workplaces.
Our initial survey findings, released today, present a stark picture. A staggering 75% of employees surveyed report that Australian workplaces need better managers and leaders. Perhaps a concerning indicator of future problems is the fact that this view is held by a majority of young people.
We are entering a period marked by the emergence of new, disruptive challenges for business. These challenges are set to undermine the competitiveness of Australian business, and cannot be met by providing businesses with tax breaks or subsidies to continue to operate at a loss.

Meeting new business challenges

The leadership gap goes well beyond formal qualifications. Recent survey evidence shows that many managers and leaders lack a number of critical technical and people skills. That undermines their capacity to maximise productivity.
Among the more significant is an inability to develop a strategic perspective that allows the business to read disruptive changes in markets, identify new opportunities and to adapt.
The flow-on effects are numerous, but inevitably a key one concerns the absence of the skills necessary to manage people, drive continuous improvement and effectively manage change. These challenges are also associated with under-developed and under-resourced HR systems.
This problem typically reflects a lack of knowledge of workplace issues other than in a reactive way. Again, the evidence on these matters shows that these challenges are most acutely felt by managers in SMEs.

Managing the future

It is now 20 years since the Karpin Report was released. This ground-breaking report, entitled Enterprising Nation, identified a number of critical challenges facing Australian managers as Australia entered the “Asian century”. It is time to take stock of these new challenges and the ability of Australia’s business leaders and managers to meet them.
The challenge here will be how government can induce business owners to take steps themselves. In particular, we need to think how we can address the challenge of improving management capability and leadership in SMEs.
These are the very businesses we are increasingly reliant on to generate employment, bring new ideas and products to the market and drive growth in the economy, but with the most limited resources to tackle the problem. Leadership and management skills will be crucial to meeting the challenge.
The Conversation
Peter Gahan receives research funding from the Australian Research Council. He is Director for the Centre for Workplace Leadership, which has been co-funded by the Commonwealth Government and The University of Melbourne.
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.